Working environment committees : stretched between strategy and participation
Institution: | Roskilde University |
---|---|
Department: | |
Year: | 2014 |
Keywords: | Legislation; OHS Committee; psychosocial work environment; Democracy; proximity; Legislation; OHS Committee; psychosocial work environment; Democracy; proximity |
Record ID: | 1120104 |
Full text PDF: | http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/17337 |
In Denmark, a new Working Environment Act was passed in 2010. The assumptions behind the act are that increased flexibility in the organization of OHS work will: 1) enable a more systematic approach, 2) elevate OHS issues to a strategic level within the company, and 3) integrate these concerns in other key business processes. In this paper we examine the validity of these assumptions through a number of qualitative case studies. We discuss whether flexibility, systematization, and strategy lead to better OHS discussions and practices within the case companies.; In Denmark, a new Working Environment Act was passed in 2010. The assumptions behind the act are that increased flexibility in the organization of OHS work will: 1) enable a more systematic approach, 2) elevate OHS issues to a strategic level within the company, and 3) integrate these concerns in other key business processes. In this paper we examine the validity of these assumptions through a number of qualitative case studies. We discuss whether flexibility, systematization, and strategy lead to better OHS discussions and practices within the case companies.