On the Interactions of News Media, Interpersonal Communication, Opinion Formation, and Participation
Deliberative Democracy and the Public Sphere
by Kim, Joohoan

Available in Paperback

Available in eBook editions
(PDF format)
Institution:
University of Pennsylvania
Advisor(s):
Elihu Katz
Degree:
Ph.D. in Communication
Year:
1997
Book Information:
350 pages
Publisher:
Dissertation.com
ISBN-10:
1581120109
ISBN-13:
9781581120103
View First 25 pages:
(free download)
Abstract
Deliberative democracy can be defined as a political system based on citizens' voluntary and free discussions on public issues. Most scholars have discussed deliberative
democracy within normative boundaries. However, based primarily on Katz's
interpretation of Tarde, this study finds the concept of public sphere
a useful framework for operationalizing the normative concept of deliberative
democracy, since the four components of the public sphere-news media use,
interpersonal communication, opinion formation, and political participation-provide
us with empirically testable categories. This study tests the validity
of theories of deliberative democracy through examining the inter-relationships
among the four components of the public sphere. Methodologically, it includes a set of 63 items to probe where people talk and what they talk about in
their daily life. An experimental treatment (a "stop-and-talk"
question) is also included in the survey to simulate the effects of real
conversation. Through a set of data gathered from a nationwide survey,
sufficient evidence was found to support the basic hypotheses: (1) news media use encourages people to have political conversation, (2) news media
use and political conversation tend to enhance the quality of opinions
(measured by consistency, opinionation, and consideredness), (3) news media
use, political conversation, and enhanced opinions encourage political
participation. The significance of this study is that: (1) unlike other
media effects studies, its dependent variables are not just of opinion
positions or attitude changes, but also opinion quality; (2) it does not
consider media alone, but deals with the combined effects of interpersonal
communication (conversation) and mass media (news media use); (3) it combines an experimental design with a nationwide survey; and (4) it assumes that
the effects of mass media do not stop at people's attitudes, but are extended
to their activities.