Abstracts

The making of a terrorist : A discourse analysis of the expert construction of violent Islamic extremism in Sweden

by Eric Hartshorne




Institution: Uppsala University
Department:
Year: 2017
Keywords: Terrorism; Violent Extremism; Discourse; Expert; Sweden; Social Sciences; Samhllsvetenskap
Posted: 02/01/2018
Record ID: 2170994
Full text PDF: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-329956


Abstract

This study focuses on the ontological and epistemological assumptions within the construction of expert knowledge regarding violent Islamic extremism in Sweden. Setting out from the academic field of critical terrorism studies, previous research highlights how following the 2001 attacks against the United States (9/11) Islam and terrorism have been presented as codependent. In this thesis I argue that in a Swedish context two overarching themes have been constructed by Swedish experts regarding violent Islamic extremists in Sweden, that of the passive victim, who is susceptible to the particular nature of their environment which is tainted by alienation, segregation, along with extremist influences; and the active threat, who is anti - democratic, manipulative, and violent. In order to analyze the discursive constructs of the experts I have strategically selected reports from four Swedish centers of expertise and thereafter analyzed the reports through a theoretical and methodological framework based upon Michel Foucaults (1972) discourse analysis. I argue that by applying Foucaults discourse analysis to the reports it is possible to see how the experts do construct a connection between Islam and Muslims to violent extremism and terrorism by ascribing a particular notion of vulnerability amongst the perceived group in regards to their susceptibility to radicalization and violent extremism. In turn, exceptionally associating violent extremism and terrorism with Islam and Muslims. More so, I argue that the experts derive their legitimacy from the Swedish government and from internal and external confirmation and are as such part of a limited epistemological community. Therefore, the Swedish government acts not only as delimiters of the emergence of experts within the field, but also in the discursive rule formation of what is deemed as related to the field of terrorism studies and what is not.