|Keywords:||Afghanistan; Corruption; Clientelism; Patronage; Neopatrimonialism; Nepotism; Embezzlement; Favoritism; Social Sciences; Samhällsvetenskap; Social and Behavioural Science, Law; samhälle/juridik; Political Science; Statsvetenskap|
|Full text PDF:||http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-30456|
Afghanistan a country affected by decades of war and invasions has been subject of democratization and state-building of foreign donors post-2001. Despite the efforts of international community for improvements of state institutions, the country is and has been located at the bottom corruption indexes for many years. This essay tries to understand and explain why Afghanistan has been at the bottom line of corruption despite external actor’s vast democracy aid and building of effective state institutions. The case study of Afghanistan with qualitative method and descriptive text analysis examine causes of corruption in Afghanistan. The materials consist of both statistical data in terms of surveys and scientific literature to provide explanations of corruption in Afghanistan. The analytical framework of the study is based on previous research where formal institutions with focus on political system and informal institutions with focus on clientelism, patronage and neopatrimonialism, are used to explain the empirical data. The findings are that corruption is endemic in Afghanistan, occurring at all sectors of the government and the main reason is the defective political structure along with patronage and clientelistic networks and a state that rest on neo-patrimonialism.