AbstractsEngineering

Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Schemes for Global Navigation Satellite Systems

by Yiping Jiang




Institution: University of New South Wales
Department: Civil & Environmental Engineering
Year: 2014
Keywords: RAIM; GPS; GNSS; Protection Level
Record ID: 1059089
Full text PDF: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/53795


Abstract

The accuracy of the navigation solutions can be greatly improved by using modernized GNSS with more visible satellites and multiple civilian frequencies. Another important performance criterion is integrity, which is defined to guarantee the safety of the navigation solution for such applications as civil aviation in which safety is of paramount issue. Integrity is used to quantify the risky situation when the position error is at a hazardous level with faults in the observations, but the user is not aware of it. Integrity faults can be a consequence of clock anomalies, cycle slips, multipath, etc. One of the popular integrity monitoring methods in civil aviation is Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM), which is essentially a consistency check on the GNSS observations by the aircraft. The output is the integrity indicators, such as Vertical Protection Level (VPL) and Horizontal Protection Level (HPL), which is a statistical bound on the position domain with given integrity risk. With the forthcoming of the modernized GPS system, new constellations and augmentation systems, the number of satellites will be increased and the multiple frequency signals will be available. Therefore, RAIM can be applied in more stringent procedures, such as LPV-200 for vertical guidance on a global scale. Two major RAIM architectures are recognized as feasible choices: Advanced RAIM (A-RAIM) and Relative RAIM (R-RAIM). Currently, there are two positioning methods (the range domain method and the position domain method) available in R-RAIM and two RAIM algorithms (the classic method and the multiple hypothesis solution separation (MHSS) method) available for both A-RAIM and R-RAIM. Based on different implementation methods, all these current choices are analysed by comparing the results within a generalized framework. The algorithms to calculate VPLs and HPLs are critically important in deciding the final integrity results for both A-RAIM and R-RAIM, which is the focus of this thesis. With the notion that all current algorithms are expected to be conservative at different levels, the exact Protection Level (PL) value within pre-defined accuracy and computational efficiency is pursued to improve the service availability and promoting RAIM in more stringent services in civil aviation. There are mainly four methods to calculate VPL in literature, among which the ideal VPL method is the least conservative one with the exact value as the ultimate goal. To calculate the ideal VPL with given integrity risk, the bias with the maximum integrity risk, which is a function of the input VPL value, is searched in a boundary. To make sure the maximum integrity risk is equal with the given one, another VPL search loop is added upon the bias search. In this way, the computation becomes complex and the precision of the result is compromised. Therefore, a new procedure is designed with a new worst case search: the maximum VPL is searched among a range to encompass all possible sizes of the bias. VPL is calculated with a given integrity risk for…